Praise for this site from Rachel on Ouranophobe. But is this site really all that she claims?

Ouranophobe: Well-written by a journalism person.
Chris Hill Festival: Hacked together by a Computer Science major who has the tendency of separating independent clauses inappropriately with commas, therefore he occasionally types in massive run-on sentences.
Ouranophobe: Lets us get to know Rachel and the inner workings of her soul even if we've only met her once in real life.
Chris Hill Festival: Resorts to posting amusing spam, which allows us to see the deepest feelings of scam artists and porn peddlers.
Ouranophobe: Updated daily, sometimes more often, even during moves and other times of flux.
Chris Hill Festival: Often left by the wayside during extraordinary times such as "weeknights".

So there you have it. The only way to truly make the decision of which is better is to read them both yourself. Every day. Even when I don't update. That's right, read the old posts again.

That and keep in mind this one fact that may explain why Rachel writes of my site so glowingly: On the other side of my room, spanning two CD-Roms, is a flawless DAT-sourced copy of the Zwan show that Rachel attended. Surely Rachel is aware that the laudatory comments on Ouranophobe will expedite its copying and delivery to her (that is if michael tells me when he is visiting her). Music is power. Muahahahaha....